coton81 Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 guys i just turned down a fight with my fighter which would of been his first defense of title and yes i know who the org is owned buy so you will b wasting your time typing about that http://www.mmatycoon.com/fighterprofilemanager.php?FID=316023 ( my guy )against http://www.mmatycoon.com/fighterprofilepublic.php?FID=310822 ( opponent offered )these where the reasons i gave 1.no fights in org and is bottom of ranking 2.im out gunned on 3 of the four primaries3. It's to quick a turn around as I'm going to lose a week's training time to recoverreply to my decline mail from grumpy 1. means nothing Peterhof dont play by P4P Check the fight matchup standards been posted and discussed for a long time now. 2. outgunned true slightly but thats whos fault? sounds like u want canned fights then instead of being matched up fairly by creation and age as the Peterhof fairness standards explain clearly? Because we are playing a MANAGER game yes? Seems like ur playing a FIGHTER game....and thats not what MMATycoon is about....its about the skills of the MANAGER....so if ur fighter is substandard why should we give u easier fights? Then its not fair to the other guy yah?3. lose a weeks training time...quick turnaround? not sure what that has to do with anything.......the event is 3 1/2 weeks away and the inactive claus is what? 33 or 30 days? so u what? want fights only within the tiny frame of time of 30 days to 33 days? I dont recall anything saying fighters MUST have a specific number of days in between fights and such a tiny window simply wont work anyway....its just not possible to schedule every fighter using that criteria and Im not gonna make a special for u...or anyone else.But one thing i DO know happens in virtually every org in the game regardless of the different criteria used for matchuops is...Champs dont turn down fights....specially by claiming they are not of good enuff caliber to fight the opponent....so there is an EASY way to handle that and thats to simply strip the belt due to running away....its pretty much admitting u dont have the right to the belt so u shouldnt have it !Easy fix my reply to grumpy 1.fair enough 2. nearly every manager in the game would turn down a figth where they r out gunned buy 3 primaries3.no i would of lost a weeks training time waiting for him to recover his stamina after his last fight which u should of known as a org ownerand if you think like that then u clearly dont know orgs as well as u think as most champs would turn down a fight with the person at the bottom of there weigth class with no fights in the org oh one more thing enjoy the loss of hype from the belt stripping 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rei Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Dude has no fights at all so fuck that joke of a match-up, and let him earn the right to fight for the title.This is coming from someone that accepts pretty much anything, too. We all know that Grump is a weird old cbomb with more than a handful of screws loose, so I'm sure this will be no surprise to anyone. You live and you learn, avoid that bastard as much as possible lol 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arlenbalesmma Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 I don't decline fights based on primaries, however, no fights in the org and a title fight? I'd decline that. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 You was right to decline imo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigLarry Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 I don't reject fights based on primaries too coz you have the creation number/date, it is up to you how to train your fighter but What does that mean, no fights and title fight????? I would decline that for sure 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timqwe Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 I feel like a champ should fight all challengers, regardless of skill, as long as it's into the agreement that the contract was signed upon. (Say if an org moves their ID from 300 to 290 when I'm under contract, I'll only fight fighters in the 300k ID range). Inactivity doesn't mean you have to fight once every certain amount of days imo, to me it's how often an org owner should offer a fight. I don't think you are under any obligation to fight someone with way less hype either, unless it was stated when signing the contract. If it's not stated, feel free to sit out until the org manages to find a properly hyped opp 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedry16 Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 In theory I'm of the opinion that as the champion you can't turn down any opponent. But how can you give a title shot to that guy, it is a slap in the face to every other single fighter in the division! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arlenbalesmma Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Imagine some guy joins the UFC and gets a shot at Max above everyone else immediately? There'd be a fucking riot. Tim Qwe is an idiot, bullshit should you accept every fight just because you're a champion. Clown. 4 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skenoj Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 you did the right thing,he join the org with 0 fights and get a title fight wtf is this, people should work hard before a title shot like a win streak ,a record or something 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coton81 Posted March 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Dude has no fights at all so fuck that joke of a match-up, and let him earn the right to fight for the title.This is coming from someone that accepts pretty much anything, too. We all know that Grump is a weird old cbomb with more than a handful of screws loose, so I'm sure this will be no surprise to anyone. You live and you learn, avoid that bastard as much as possible lol i normally do except most fights with in reason as well haha only got to look at my historic record for that its no surprise to me but up in till now he had been a ok with me I don't decline fights based on primaries, however, no fights in the org and a title fight? I'd decline that. im not one to normally but with the no fights etc and only going to get 2 weeks training time as he would need a week to recover from last fight i thought it for the best You was right to decline imo. thank you i thought so to I don't reject fights based on primaries too coz you have the creation number/date, it is up to you how to train your fighter but What does that mean, no fights and title fight????? I would decline that for sure wouldn't of declined it either but i would of missed a week of training time b4 i could train them up and i felt i need more than 2 week to make him competitive I feel like a champ should fight all challengers, regardless of skill, as long as it's into the agreement that the contract was signed upon. (Say if an org moves their ID from 300 to 290 when I'm under contract, I'll only fight fighters in the 300k ID range). Inactivity doesn't mean you have to fight once every certain amount of days imo, to me it's how often an org owner should offer a fight. I don't think you are under any obligation to fight someone with way less hype either, unless it was stated when signing the contract. If it's not stated, feel free to sit out until the org manages to find a properly hyped opp i would of taken it if he had of messaged me and tried to work something out b4 stripping belt but thats grumpy for u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timqwe Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Imagine some guy joins the UFC and gets a shot at Max above everyone else immediately? There'd be a fucking riot. Tim Qwe is an idiot, bullshit should you accept every fight just because you're a champion. Clown.If you learned to read, that's not what I'm saying. Now shush, the adults are talking 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjrfin Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 I'd take the fight. Yeah, it is a strange match-up, defending a title against a fighter with zero fights. But it's an untested fighter, so it's more likely that he's a pillow fisted, heartless, class chin bleeder, than a killer. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coton81 Posted March 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 In theory I'm of the opinion that as the champion you can't turn down any opponent. But how can you give a title shot to that guy, it is a slap in the face to every other single fighter in the division! i wouldnt of normally turned it down but as there was higher ranked fighters with a winning record i thoughts it wasnt right Imagine some guy joins the UFC and gets a shot at Max above everyone else immediately? There'd be a fucking riot. Tim Qwe is an idiot, bullshit should you accept every fight just because you're a champion. Clown. i can c where tim is coming from if u cant play nice gtfo of my thread you did the right thing,he join the org with 0 fights and get a title fight wtf is this, people should work hard before a title shot like a win streak ,a record or something there was a couple of higher ranked fighters with a winning record i would of gave it to first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coton81 Posted March 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 doesn't matter now any way my guy has been stripped of the belt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timqwe Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 i wouldnt of normally turned it down but as there was higher ranked fighters with a winning record i thoughts it wasnt right i can c where tim is coming from if u cant play nice gtfo of my thread there was a couple of higher ranked fighters with a winning record i would of gave it to first And that is exactly the jest of what I'm saying. I don't think you should just turn down a fight as a champ, just because the challenger is way better. That comes with being the champ. Campaigning to fight a higher hyped opponent is perfectly fine, unless you were already aware that that's not how the org works when you became champ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arlenbalesmma Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 i wouldnt of normally turned it down but as there was higher ranked fighters with a winning record i thoughts it wasnt right i can c where tim is coming from if u cant play nice gtfo of my thread there was a couple of higher ranked fighters with a winning record i would of gave it to first Lmao shut the fuck up. Don't join Grumpy's org and then come crying on the forum about it in the first place. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timqwe Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Lmao shut the fuck up. Don't join Grumpy's org and then come crying on the forum about it in the first place.Make sure you post with the right account kid 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coton81 Posted March 16, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 And that is exactly the jest of what I'm saying. I don't think you should just turn down a fight as a champ, just because the challenger is way better. That comes with being the champ. Campaigning to fight a higher hyped opponent is perfectly fine, unless you were already aware that that's not how the org works when you became champ i knew he had some weird rules about age and points for match making or something like that but i thought he would of been willing to deal with me but i should of known really ive read the threads about him well live and learn and all that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arlenbalesmma Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Make sure you post with the right account kid Right you are weaboo 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steel Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 I wouldnt have accepted it. Doubt many or any veteran managers would. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imcool Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 LMAO typical grumpy fagbag. Loves to talk up the whole deal w/ the "fair fights" in his org, then pulls this shit...Jugs fighter has nearly a 6k fighter ID advantage...thats months and months of training. I won't even mention the record/hype lol. Joke of an org. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boble Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Well, in all truth a Champ should defend against whatever he's offered, I didn't even check primaries, but that fight would be a waste for the Organisation, putting a 0-0 non hyped fighter against the Champ, thats bullshit..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeF Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 This is what happens when you give an org to someone who knows just qfc. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trump2020 Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 Champion turning down fights and complaining about it? If you are champ you should fight anyone anytime anywhere. 2 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHL Posted March 16, 2018 Report Share Posted March 16, 2018 I wouldve 100% rejected that too. High risk with low/no reward, thats not how orgs are supposed to operate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.