Forums

No alternates necessary. Just need people to accept fights and it's party time. Can work with any amount of fighters too but obviously the more the merrier.

I somehow missed it until now, but the situation with public gyms is terrible at the moment. In total, there are currently 31 of them operating outside the island, 7 of which are run by managers who have not logged in this month. If you look at it more closely, the situation turns out to be even worse. There are no public gyms in Amsterdam or Rio de Janeiro. There are actually two in New York, but none of their managers have logged into the game this month. The situation is similar in Sydney, where the only public gym is run by a manager who remained active for 9 days. Perhaps there is another way to solve this problem, but I can't think of anything better, and something should be done about it...

See The Match Results, Watch Post-Fight Interviews With The Winners And More From UFC APEX In Las Vegas Read the Full Article Here[url={url}]View the full article[/url]

Suggestion: Org tier list Suggestions Description: I would like to have more of the feeling that orgs are at different levels. So what if we made a pyramid league for orgs, similar to the alliance one. They would score points in this league based on number of fights (up to a point like other pyramids), hype of fights and attendance. Also inter-org fights must be made to play a part in it regardless of who is hosting, let winning org get bonus points and loser minus. What pyramid level your org is in would directly translate to its tier and could be linked to other ingame effects. Maybe only the higher tier orgs may book the largest arenas for example, or get more options for Press conferences. it would also go well with other ideas like Manager rank weighting and Benefits from holding titles which could be weighted based on the org tier. I think it would go well with the competitive spirit of the game. You can still earn money with a lower tier org. But to eventually succeed in openid you need to claw your way into the top tier to attract the top talent. Holding belts in the top tier org at end of every month should count for something and could become a statistic to track and tally for the whole year. The number of orgs per tier has to be given some thought. If the playerbase grows again there would also be more orgs. Balancing the points also requires some thought and should be done by someone with more org running experience than I have. Pros: Add another dimension to the org owner game. Make players more invested in the success of the orgs they are in. Cons: Would give org owners incentive for shenanigans to manipulate the rankings.. in a way that is not too far off real life and how things work in other parts of the game but cannot be allowed to go too far.

[url={url}]View the full article[/url]