Jump to content


Photo

Split decision: Paul Felder vs Edson Barboza

UFC Robbery? Paul felder Edson Barboza

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

Poll: Edison Barboza vs Paul Felder decision (10 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you think Edison Barboza was robbed yesterday?

  1. Yes, he was clearly better! (1 votes [10.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  2. No, Paul Felder may have lost the first round but clearly won the other two. (1 votes [10.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  3. Should have been a tie (1 votes [10.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  4. It may have been close, but probably the right decision was made. (7 votes [70.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 70.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 JohnnYPuff

JohnnYPuff

    White Belt

  • Manager
  • 40 posts

Posted 09 September 2019 - 08:02 AM

I'm not sure myself what to think of the decision yesterday, but for me to score it 30:27 is ridiculous after that fight. (for Felder and Barboza)
  • 0

#2 Rei

Rei

    Black Belt

  • Developer
  • 1,466 posts

Posted 09 September 2019 - 09:35 AM

Barboza should've got the decision but ultimately I don't care as I bet big on Felder lmao


  • 0

#3 Fallen.Angel

Fallen.Angel

    Red Belt

  • Manager
  • 2,660 posts

Posted 09 September 2019 - 03:41 PM

Barboa should have got the decision, in my opinion
3rd rounds was definitely Felder

but 30-27 for Felder ? wow ! ... may be perks of working for UFC ;)


  • 0

Camp League :- x1 Winners (Camp Fallen.Angel)

Pick'em League :- x1 Winner, x2 Runner-up
Camp-Fallen-Angels-Sig-v1-7-2019.png15-nuggets.jpg

 
 

#4 Mentor

Mentor

    Red Belt

  • Developer
  • 5,691 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cyprus
  • Interests:Games, MMA, Basketball
  • Manager Profile

Posted 10 September 2019 - 06:46 AM

The 30:27 was ridiculous, that judge needs to get a new job. It is hard to say though, i think Barboza clearly won #1 and Fielder won #3, the 2nd round was not that easy to score, i think overall Fielder wanted it more, so a 29:28 would not be ridiculous. 


  • 1

#5 barney

barney

    Purple Belt

  • Manager
  • 264 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil
  • Interests:Sports physician. Guitar player. Super Troll. Major asshole.
  • Manager Profile

Posted 10 September 2019 - 02:20 PM

IMO

round 1: Clear advantage Barboza, easy 10:9
round 2: Close but clear for Felder, 10:9 (might be hard to rule because Barboza started strong and got a TD, but he literally disappeared after the TD, lots of bottom elbows from Felder that cut Barboza and after stand up, he just lost the gas and the will... Felder won IMO because bigger volume after this and finishing strong)

Round 3 Clear advantage Felder 10:9

And I'm Brazillian. This should say something


  • 2

#6 Rambo

Rambo

    Red Belt

  • Developer
  • 9,668 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ganja Paradise
  • Interests:MMA, Football, Marijuana, Politics
  • Manager Profile

Posted 12 September 2019 - 07:58 PM

IMO
round 1: Clear advantage Barboza, easy 10:9
round 2: Close but clear for Felder, 10:9 (might be hard to rule because Barboza started strong and got a TD, but he literally disappeared after the TD, lots of bottom elbows from Felder that cut Barboza and after stand up, he just lost the gas and the will... Felder won IMO because bigger volume after this and finishing strong)
Round 3 Clear advantage Felder 10:9

And I'm Brazillian. This should say something


I would accept that. I like Felders proposal of 5 rounds for the trilogy.
  • 0

Posted Image

Posted Image






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: UFC, Robbery?, Paul felder, Edson Barboza

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users