MasterLeader Posted December 8, 2017 Report Share Posted December 8, 2017 Details to be confirmed later, but who's interested and are there any changes you'd like to see? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzasco Posted December 8, 2017 Report Share Posted December 8, 2017 Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 8, 2017 Report Share Posted December 8, 2017 I am IN but would love to see some more statistics taken into count when making the camp total points (we went 2 leagues with the current stat-counts ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacman Posted December 8, 2017 Report Share Posted December 8, 2017 I am IN but would love to see some more statistics taken into count when making the camp total points (we went 2 leagues with the current stat-counts ) Same, I have always wanted to have the camp v camp record as a stat. Maybe a total finishes stat as well but other than that I like the way it's set up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The1rstSaint Posted December 9, 2017 Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 In as well. I will check with Alliance mates if we need more managers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLP Posted December 9, 2017 Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 The only change I'd like to recommend is blocking sell back of fighters in the aftermath of a loss. We should have to wait until the next rankings are released to establish a sell back price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeonStolz Posted December 9, 2017 Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 I would be interested in joining this league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterLeader Posted December 9, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 The only change I'd like to recommend is blocking sell back of fighters in the aftermath of a loss. We should have to wait until the next rankings are released to establish a sell back price. Agreed - how about when a fighter's released and it's obvious they're going to drop and/or done for drugs etc...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterLeader Posted December 9, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 Also I'd like some help running it - Fallen.Angel you on board? Anyone else? No reason we can't slice this between 3 or even 4 of us and allocate roles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timqwe Posted December 9, 2017 Report Share Posted December 9, 2017 I'll join again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 I'm obvs in too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 10, 2017 Report Share Posted December 10, 2017 Same, I have always wanted to have the camp v camp record as a stat. Maybe a total finishes stat as well but other than that I like the way it's set up. Ye total finishes could be a nice addition. The only change I'd like to recommend is blocking sell back of fighters in the aftermath of a loss. We should have to wait until the next rankings are released to establish a sell back price. I'm on board with this as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rei Posted December 13, 2017 Report Share Posted December 13, 2017 Interested for sure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 14, 2017 Report Share Posted December 14, 2017 MasterLeader Gonzasco FallenAngel Jacman 1rstSaint JLP LeonStolz Timqwe RozzaD Rei Would be good to get between 12-16! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 14, 2017 Report Share Posted December 14, 2017 BUMP ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernNinjas Posted December 14, 2017 Report Share Posted December 14, 2017 I'm in again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterLeader Posted December 15, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2017 Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000? Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think? Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus): Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better] Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeonStolz Posted December 15, 2017 Report Share Posted December 15, 2017 I don't have $50,000, unfortunately. If you do want to do an entry fee I would probably have to drop out because I only have about $15,000. The underdog bonus sounds pretty good and the fastest finish bonus would also be nifty. I don't like the domination bonus or the last round finish one just because the judges are usually always all over the place with their scores. I imagine there would be a lot of times someone should have gotten a 10-8 round or someone should be behind 2 rounds but if the judges or sherdog don't score it that way but everyone else does it will just lead to a lot of anger and annoyance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLP Posted December 16, 2017 Report Share Posted December 16, 2017 Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000? Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think? Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus): Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better] Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings. I dont like any of the bonuses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humble Posted December 16, 2017 Report Share Posted December 16, 2017 Hey I'd like to join. How does this work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLP Posted December 16, 2017 Report Share Posted December 16, 2017 I don't have $50,000, unfortunately. If you do want to do an entry fee I would probably have to drop out because I only have about $15,000. The underdog bonus sounds pretty good and the fastest finish bonus would also be nifty. I don't like the domination bonus or the last round finish one just because the judges are usually always all over the place with their scores. I imagine there would be a lot of times someone should have gotten a 10-8 round or someone should be behind 2 rounds but if the judges or sherdog don't score it that way but everyone else does it will just lead to a lot of anger and annoyance. I'll cover your fee. 50k sent. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeonStolz Posted December 16, 2017 Report Share Posted December 16, 2017 I'll cover your fee. 50k sent. Wow, thanks JLP I appreciate it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacman Posted December 16, 2017 Report Share Posted December 16, 2017 Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000? Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think? Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus): Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better] Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings. I don't mind these but I feel like this thing is already pretty complicated so adding all this would be almost impossible to keep up. I'm down for a fee though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 16, 2017 Report Share Posted December 16, 2017 Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000? Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think? Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus): Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better] Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings. Sorry but I also don't like these. Trust me you will updating enough as is - these days there are a lot of cards, having to check different sites and shit to see who is biggest underdog etc etc would be a real mission. Even you said you were looking for help with next year before suggesting these additions haha. Another thing is noone is short of money in the current league... I don't feel any need to give more opportunities to make more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.