Jump to content

UFC Camp League 2018


MasterLeader

Recommended Posts

I am IN :)

 

but would love to see some more statistics taken into count when making the camp total points (we went 2 leagues with the current stat-counts )

 

 

 

Same, I have always wanted to have the camp v camp record as a stat. Maybe a total finishes stat as well but other than that I like the way it's set up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only change I'd like to recommend is blocking sell back of fighters in the aftermath of a loss. We should have to wait until the next rankings are released to establish a sell back price.

Agreed - how about when a fighter's released and it's obvious they're going to drop and/or done for drugs etc...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Same, I have always wanted to have the camp v camp record as a stat. Maybe a total finishes stat as well but other than that I like the way it's set up.

 

Ye total finishes could be a nice addition.

 

The only change I'd like to recommend is blocking sell back of fighters in the aftermath of a loss. We should have to wait until the next rankings are released to establish a sell back price.

 

I'm on board with this as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000?

 

Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think?

 

Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus):

 

Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card

 

Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards

 

Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better]

 

Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win

 

Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have $50,000, unfortunately. :( If you do want to do an entry fee I would probably have to drop out because I only have about $15,000.

The underdog bonus sounds pretty good and the fastest finish bonus would also be nifty.

 

I don't like the domination bonus or the last round finish one just because the judges are usually always all over the place with their scores. I imagine there would be a lot of times someone should have gotten a 10-8 round or someone should be behind 2 rounds but if the judges or sherdog don't score it that way but everyone else does it will just lead to a lot of anger and annoyance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000?

 

Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think?

 

Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus):

 

Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card

 

Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards

 

Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better]

 

Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win

 

Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings.

I dont like any of the bonuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have $50,000, unfortunately. :( If you do want to do an entry fee I would probably have to drop out because I only have about $15,000.

The underdog bonus sounds pretty good and the fastest finish bonus would also be nifty.

 

I don't like the domination bonus or the last round finish one just because the judges are usually always all over the place with their scores. I imagine there would be a lot of times someone should have gotten a 10-8 round or someone should be behind 2 rounds but if the judges or sherdog don't score it that way but everyone else does it will just lead to a lot of anger and annoyance.

I'll cover your fee. 50k sent.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000?

 

Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think?

 

Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus):

 

Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card

 

Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards

 

Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better]

 

Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win

 

Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings.

I don't mind these but I feel like this thing is already pretty complicated so adding all this would be almost impossible to keep up. I'm down for a fee though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would be open for a small fee? Like $50,000?

 

Also how about a new rule where you get something out of a split decision loss rather than being treated the same as a bad loss? Same goes with draws - what do you guys think?

 

Some random bonus point suggestions ($3,000 per bonus):

 

Fastest Finish Bonus - goes to your fighter if they happen to have the fastest finish on the card

 

Last round finish bonus IF the fighter is deemed behind on sherdog's cards

 

Domination bonus - if two or more judges give more than 30-27 with the others giving all rounds to the winning fighter [i.e. 30-26,30-26,30-27 or better]

 

Huge underdog bonus - if deemed at point of fight (per tapology) as +400 or worse and pulls off a win

 

Thoughts? I don't want to overcomplicate things. Plus a lot of these should've been accounted for in the rankings.

 

Sorry but I also don't like these. Trust me you will updating enough as is - these days there are a lot of cards, having to check different sites and shit to see who is biggest underdog etc etc would be a real mission.

 

Even you said you were looking for help with next year before suggesting these additions haha. Another thing is noone is short of money in the current league... I don't feel any need to give more opportunities to make more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...