Jump to content


Photo

QFC hype loss and gain

nerf QFC hype

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Bwang

Bwang

    Red Belt

  • Developer
  • 5,896 posts

Posted 15 April 2015 - 12:03 PM

To bring up again a subject that is endlessly discussed:

Please can we 1) minimise or 2) eliminate all hype increase and decrease from QFC fights.
Not QFC orgs, not QFC tournaments, I'm talking about the one off fights.

I have prospects I want to test fight more but I don't, as I care about my manager rank. Yes we all have this problem, yes some people don't care about their manager rank, yes people claim if you train your guy to 999.99 points you shouldn't have a problem (nonsense in my view); I just don't want my rank to depend on a random test fight where I am looking to see if I have a keeper or if I want to sack him and make another - which is all good $ for Mike.

Any chance of getting this changed?!

Also I am aware some orgs let you have one off fights v your own fighters to help fill a card etc, but I also just want the simple easy basic QFC fight option to be less ... deadly. It takes a while to climb the ranks with good wins over tough opponents, then all your gains can be gone with one QFC loss.
  • 0

#2 FallenFlyer

FallenFlyer

    Purple Belt

  • Manager
  • 276 posts

Posted 15 April 2015 - 02:21 PM

Does that not undermine the point of risk?

 

Surely the point of risking a new build to see if they are any good is putting your ranking on the line. Otherwise there is no punishment for building and releasing fighter after fighter until you (and everyone else) has a group of super humans.


  • 5

#3 Bwang

Bwang

    Red Belt

  • Developer
  • 5,896 posts

Posted 15 April 2015 - 06:53 PM

I suppose I understand your point.  I do want a group of super humans though.  Nothing will stop me ahahahahhahaha!!

 

I still think the hype hit could be dialled down a bit though.  I'm not joking about slowly struggling up the rankings with a few wins here, a loss there, all against good quality opposition managers, and then having to test new prospects and dropping like a stone what with fighting noobs.  Often noobs with 25 yr old ground fighters versus my stand up 18 yr olds.


  • 1

#4 GBK16

GBK16

    Pikachu

  • Developer
  • 9,668 posts

Posted 15 April 2015 - 07:07 PM

I suppose I understand your point.  I do want a group of super humans though.  Nothing will stop me ahahahahhahaha!!

 

I still think the hype hit could be dialled down a bit though.  I'm not joking about slowly struggling up the rankings with a few wins here, a loss there, all against good quality opposition managers, and then having to test new prospects and dropping like a stone what with fighting noobs.  Often noobs with 25 yr old ground fighters versus my stand up 18 yr olds.

You don't have to tell me about dropping like a stone for testing guys :D

 

Honestly, I think it is fine. QFC's are meant to be testing grounds, but with little to no hype loss, there is almost 0 risk attached to it. We already have a load of people set their guys up deliberately to lose to test confidence, imagine how many more there will be with reduced risk.

 

Just to show you, I fell from top 200 to sub 1000 for testing fighters. It is something I expected to get from losing 12 out of 14 fights.


  • 2

1482792032image.jpg

The Six Musketeers

5x Division 1 Champs (Feb/Mar/Apr/May/Sep '17) // 1x Division 2 (Jan '17) // Division 3 (Dec '16) // Division 4 (Nov '16) champs

tumblr_nfgpck1Lbr1tf69j8o1_400.giflaughter.gif

"Darkness Extracts People, Regressing Every Single Soul, Illness Of Nature"


#5 FallenFlyer

FallenFlyer

    Purple Belt

  • Manager
  • 276 posts

Posted 15 April 2015 - 07:12 PM

I suppose I understand your point.  I do want a group of super humans though.  Nothing will stop me ahahahahhahaha!!

 

I still think the hype hit could be dialled down a bit though.  I'm not joking about slowly struggling up the rankings with a few wins here, a loss there, all against good quality opposition managers, and then having to test new prospects and dropping like a stone what with fighting noobs.  Often noobs with 25 yr old ground fighters versus my stand up 18 yr olds.

 

I definitely think you have a point about low level (read new) fighters losing having an undue effect on manager rankings considering how hard it is to win at the top level (not that I have ever fought there). Perhaps a little sensible scaling would be useful. 


  • 1

#6 handgrenaide

handgrenaide

    Brown Belt

  • Manager
  • 921 posts

Posted 15 April 2015 - 07:27 PM

I suppose I understand your point.  I do want a group of super humans though.  Nothing will stop me ahahahahhahaha!! I still think the hype hit could be dialled down a bit though.  I'm not joking about slowly struggling up the rankings with a few wins here, a loss there, all against good quality opposition managers, and then having to test new prospects and dropping like a stone what with fighting noobs.  Often noobs with 25 yr old ground fighters versus my stand up 18 yr olds.

18 vs 25
Works out sometimes

25 yo wrestler
http://www.mmatycoon...php?FTID=739630

25 yo boxer
http://www.mmatycoon...php?FTID=740703

Or you could try this to save opponent rank
http://www.mmatycoon...ic=48333&page=1
  • 0

Sometimes I laugh with God about how you can't stop me.


#7 bjornmma1

bjornmma1

    Red Belt

  • Manager
  • 8,630 posts

Posted 19 April 2015 - 09:44 AM

I agree that something is off with the ranking system because if an important win in a top 10 org makes you win around 10 spots and a loss in a qfc makes you lose 40 spots, something is not right... 

 

I think qfc's shouldn't have anything to do with hype or ranking. 


  • -1

144688237210gd6xc.jpg 2psljrc.jpg

 


#8 Bwang

Bwang

    Red Belt

  • Developer
  • 5,896 posts

Posted 19 April 2015 - 10:02 AM

I agree that something is off with the ranking system because if an important win in a top 10 org makes you win around 10 spots and a loss in a qfc makes you lose 40 spots, something is not right... 
 
I think qfc's shouldn't have anything to do with hype or ranking.


Exactamundo!
  • 0

#9 cmattos

cmattos

    Blue Belt

  • Manager
  • 82 posts

Posted 19 April 2015 - 10:32 PM

qfc should be by age and skiilpoints in general

18-21limited skillpoints

22-25 limited skillpoints

but its fine cos have tournaments 

honestly, the best are 18 yo limits and 1 day created


  • -1

#10 juret

juret

    Blue Belt

  • Manager
  • 173 posts

Posted 22 April 2015 - 09:18 PM

i dont do new fighters this was couse of hype loss. For me ranking is more competetive and fun to try up at all times then create-kick-qfc-check learning speed 42 times to get UBER fighters.


  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: nerf, QFC, hype

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users