Guest Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 is 6.3 a decent leaning speed? (18 year old with 1 on 1 coach) the same as from useless -- to useless + Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 I hear that a fighter is supposed to go from useless -- to abysmal -- to be a good learner but I'm not sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kole Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 is 6.3 a decent leaning speed? (18 year old with 1 on 1 coach) the same as from useless -- to useless + It's quite good. Definitely a keeper if his other hiddens are good. The best I've had was 7.25 or 7.35. I've heard people say that 7.5 is the max but I'm not sure if that's true. I hear that a fighter is supposed to go from useless -- to abysmal -- to be a good learner but I'm not sure. I don't think that is possible. Maybe before the training changes it was possible, I'm not sure because I didn't pay much attention to learning speeds back then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warwynd Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 It's quite good. Definitely a keeper if his other hiddens are good. The best I've had was 7.25 or 7.35. I've heard people say that 7.5 is the max but I'm not sure if that's true. I don't think that is possible. Maybe before the training changes it was possible, I'm not sure because I didn't pay much attention to learning speeds back then. 6.3 is not terrible.... the best I have ever had is 9.2 or somewhere around there. I don't remember the exact number, but it was over 9.... and that is a fighter I have on my roster currently.... but 6.3 is not terrible by any means. If he has other good hiddens then he is definitely a keeper. Going from Useless -- to Useless+ is certainly not the worst that could happen. Going to Abysmal + is ideal however. (Obviously) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kole Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 6.3 is not terrible.... the best I have ever had is 9.2 or somewhere around there. I don't remember the exact number, but it was over 9.... and that is a fighter I have on my roster currently.... but 6.3 is not terrible by any means. If he has other good hiddens then he is definitely a keeper. Going from Useless -- to Useless+ is certainly not the worst that could happen. Going to Abysmal + is ideal however. (Obviously) He is an older fighter? I'm pretty sure over 9 learners don't exist anymore. Or then I've been completely mistaken 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 Wait what are you guys talking about? how do I know if mine goes from useless to useless+. anyone care to dumb it down for me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 Thanks for all the replies. btw, the coach was not elite, was remarkable. Cisco, you see it with tycoon Assistant. Pick one stat that you know is the minimum and see what happens after 1 training session. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 so for example my defensive grappling went from useless to Abysmal-- is that what yall are talking about? and what the hell does that mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warwynd Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 He is an older fighter? I'm pretty sure over 9 learners don't exist anymore. Or then I've been completely mistaken Nope. One of my newest fighters. Best Learning speed I have ever heard of. At least since the old days before I even started playing the game that is. so for example my defensive grappling went from useless to Abysmal-- is that what yall are talking about? and what the hell does that mean. Yes that is what we are talking about. Going from -- to - is anywhere between .01 and 2.5 points depending on where your were in the --. So if you made a fighter with no points in say TDD then he is at the minimum number for Useless, which is 1.98 (I think). He would pop to Abysmal at 10 so that means that if he went from Useless-- to Abysmal-- in one session then he has gained at least 8.02 points. Hope that clears it up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadDisney Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 Nope. One of my newest fighters. Best Learning speed I have ever heard of. At least since the old days before I even started playing the game that is. Yes that is what we are talking about. Going from -- to - is anywhere between .01 and 2.5 points depending on where your were in the --. So if you made a fighter with no points in say TDD then he is at the minimum number for Useless, which is 1.98 (I think). He would pop to Abysmal at 10 so that means that if he went from Useless-- to Abysmal-- in one session then he has gained at least 8.02 points. Hope that clears it up. Warwynd, I'd bet every Tycoon dollar I have that you do not have a fighter with a learning speed of 9. You had to have made a mistake somewhere. How many points did you start with before you used the G-monkey script? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadDisney Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 And to the OP: 6.3 is a pretty decent learning speed (although it wouldn't be if we could all have niners like Warwynd ). I have kept guys with speeds in the low fives, but they had the hiddens to justify sticking with them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 I got it now. Thanks guys for clearing it up!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warwynd Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 Whatever the starting points for an 18 year old are. I don't remember the exact number he scored on his test, but my jaw dropped when I saw him go from Useless-- to Abysmal+ in one session. That makes it at the very least an 8.2 depending on where exactly he fell in Abysmal-. Although to be fair we are talking about a Cardio session with a 160Q supplement... which could mean that he was as slow as 7 something... depending on how much those supps help. He scored very well in a coached session as well though and he is without a doubt the fastest learner that I have ever seen. (in my own experience at any rate, I am sure the old school guys were higher.) Unfortunately the guy is kind of a moron as far as adapting his game plan.... Oh well.... he has decent hiddens overall it seems.... now if only his manager could pull his head out of his ass and get him a good slider setting... Abysmal-, not +.... doh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warwynd Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 The point I was trying to make was that 6.3 is not a bad learning speed in any event. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClarkKent Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Yeah i remember back in the day you could get to abysmal-- after one session but now I'd really say anything around 6 is above average. I've made my own chart of all the learning speeds and what you can expect after "X" amount of sessions and so on. In my opinion i keep anything over about 5.5 for learning speed but they'd have to show pretty decent hiddens if they're on the lower end of that scale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Although to be fair we are talking about a Cardio session with a 160Q supplement... which could mean that he was as slow as 7 something... Physicals are not affected by learning speed, so I recon we found the issue here. E: In case that wasn't clear, every fighter in MMA Tycoon would have reached the same result given the same prerequisites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warwynd Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Yeah... I agree.... that is why I recanted a bit.... I feel slightly stupid after having thought it over and coming to that conclusion.... The fighter in question IS however still my best learner to date... Just not as high as I may have suggested.... Still feeling a bit sheepish over this one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.