Jump to content

santa

Manager
  • Posts

    416
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Manager ID
    8353

Recent Profile Visitors

1,243 profile views

santa's Achievements

Purple Belt

Purple Belt (3/6)

2

Reputation

  1. losing and losing can be something completely different. And if you enter a game, get thrown against something that you absolutely can't win with no possible means is more than frustrating. And I can't blame anybody if he loses interest in such a flawed system. It is like entering a ring with bribed judges and a bribed referee. The whole system works against you. There is no competition, there is no fight. There is no game, because in a game you would have a small chance of winning. So fuck this stupid realism discussion and just do it the unrealistic way. And all the shame and disrespect on those that enjoy taking the wins from new managers in QFC and defend the flaws in the system that some cowards abuse.
  2. Me, the one fighter who is one of those 4 in the tripple Elite clinchwork session.
  3. +1 all those illiterate that think they are getting screwed over should learn to read what is in the contract, and should learn to think what they are about to lose. Where is the problem if somebody offers you a low contract for 30 days!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yeah, like you are about to lose that 100000 billion sponsorship that you had in the back. As if you would lose anything by using that free sponsorship slot that was rotting on your fighter anyway. Now when you are able to read, read the sponsorship contract, and decline in a mannered way. If you can't read then you get what you deserver. And what you get is nothing, and Oh boy, what you lose is nothing.
  4. does it do the age modified values based on days, weeks, or years? Because it seems like my newest creations are a bit behind compared to the other 18 year olds
  5. Nobody has to be a telepath to see that you are going trough this posts with a mindset to find every single mistake and jump on it. It is natural aggressiveness in the clash of different opinions. I was in enough podium debates to know how it works, and it works better when you have a debatte going on, and not a written piece. It is pretty obvious what you do, because one can see your mistakes. Because obviously you thought you had find a statement of mine that you could nail as a mistake and you jumped ahead 2 steps at once. You attacked before you even fully understood the one simple statement and conclusion I made. Where in the hell did I say you needed 2 companies to fund a private gym OMG.... so tune back the search for the mistakes, and tune up the effort to try and understand what others a writing without jumping to conclusions they never made. Because all I said is that I have a problem with gyms funded by a secondairy company. Now nowhere did I mention anything about the private gyms that arent funded by a secondairy company. Now you jumped to the conclusion that by not mentioning them, I would think they could not exist, and ..... you are so wrong. (that was me on an passive aggressive mode showing you the mistakes you made and trying at the same time to attack your general ability to discuss and draw logical conclusions from the facts you have, thus undermining your credibility )
  6. Multiplying it by 9 rather than 12 is enough for a starting gym.
  7. As a Gym owner you offer the cardio sessions for free. You have no costs involved for your gym. On the other hand, you can not ban the cardio training from your gym.... You missunderstood the whole concept or used a wrong vocabulary in your post. I think you should read the wiki again concerning training and cardio. Next you should visit some fighter building threads and learn why cardio is cheap and easy to train. You have to do some hours of reading in the noob section I think.
  8. double post. but to help you out, read it in a less aggressive state of mind, and analyse the statement and the conclusion like a mathematical or logical equation that represent 2 statements that have some link. I thought we were talking here about unfairness. Realism is an entire other field we should not get involved here, or we are going to lose ourselves in endless discussions. That is the reason why I limited my statement before to one specific situation that is unfair. All the other situations can be created by everyone ingame and can be considered as fair. Invictus just missunderstood and took that limitation for a generalisation to everything.
  9. this suggests nothing of that sort. It wasn't an absolute statement, it was a statement that was clearly based on 2 singular facts.
  10. you would have the same benefit from a 12 elites, 85 member gym, than a 1 elite, 1 member gym. In conclusion all those that can not fund a private gym with their 2nd company can get the same quality training than those that have a 2nd company
  11. +1 with all the feeling of unfairness in the community, it would be acceptable for me to make 1on1 training just as bad as 3on1.
  12. has been talked about lots and lots in the appropriate forum, the "improvement section". It would add an amount of coding that is barely in relation to the added fun factor. Why do people crowd the general discussion with topics that are first: already been talked about and have been discussed second: in the complete wrong forum
  13. rofl, that girl actually got her fighter sponsored. Says much about those company owners, rofl
  14. And on top of that, if we knew all the factors that apply to that situation anyone but the programmar, will give you a roughly estimation that might be correct with a roughly estimate failure percentage of little less than 50%.
  15. So you actually say that franky is right, you don't need advertising on your first event?
×
×
  • Create New...